<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Legal Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-279067</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 17:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-279067</guid>
		<description>I don't see how you can compete with the Lexis / WestLaw duopoly without the capacity to do the functional equivalent of Shepardizing, i.e., finding out which courts followed, contradicted, distinguished, overruled, commented on, etc. the holdings of other courts, with the click of a button.  Else you just get a wealth of information, in the form of decisions, that can't be used to understand the current state of the law in a given jurisdiction (at least not in a reasonable amount of time.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how you can compete with the Lexis / WestLaw duopoly without the capacity to do the functional equivalent of Shepardizing, i.e., finding out which courts followed, contradicted, distinguished, overruled, commented on, etc. the holdings of other courts, with the click of a button.  Else you just get a wealth of information, in the form of decisions, that can&#8217;t be used to understand the current state of the law in a given jurisdiction (at least not in a reasonable amount of time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldfox</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278982</link>
		<dc:creator>oldfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278982</guid>
		<description>Has anyone had any experience with FastCase?
https://www.fastcase.com/Corporate/Home.aspx
&lt;a href="https://www.fastcase.com/Corporate/Home.aspx" title="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Personally, I am not awfully eager to pay the attorney fee for a lawyer that will not pay for legal research.

"There is really no reason to pay Lexis or Westlaw anything if you don’t have to."  Malpractice or ineffective assistance of counsel  are not good enough reason for you, are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone had any experience with FastCase?<br />
<a href="https://www.fastcase.com/Corporate/Home.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://www.fastcase.com/Corporate/Home.aspx</a><br />
<a href="https://www.fastcase.com/Corporate/Home.aspx" title="" rel="nofollow"></a><br />
Personally, I am not awfully eager to pay the attorney fee for a lawyer that will not pay for legal research.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is really no reason to pay Lexis or Westlaw anything if you don’t have to.&#8221;  Malpractice or ineffective assistance of counsel  are not good enough reason for you, are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278897</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278897</guid>
		<description>Justin:

I agree that there needs to be more than just the duopoly of Lexis &#38; WestLaw.  For what I do I need to run searches for caselaw usually no more than 10 days old.  For low costs searches on newer data-- which is what I focus on -- unfortunately Altlaw can't yet deliver.

With that said, Altlaw is handsdown better than findlaw or any of the West products out there, as well as better than any other source out there (other than lexisone).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin:</p>
<p>I agree that there needs to be more than just the duopoly of Lexis &amp; WestLaw.  For what I do I need to run searches for caselaw usually no more than 10 days old.  For low costs searches on newer data&#8211; which is what I focus on &#8212; unfortunately Altlaw can&#8217;t yet deliver.</p>
<p>With that said, Altlaw is handsdown better than findlaw or any of the West products out there, as well as better than any other source out there (other than lexisone).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Levine</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278894</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278894</guid>
		<description>Karl - 

Lexisone may have more caselaw available so far, but I don't find their search algorythms to be nearly as good. You still have to wade through much more dreck to find what you are looking for compared to my experience with Altlaw thus far. But I'm keeping an open mind. There is plenty of room for more than one search site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl - </p>
<p>Lexisone may have more caselaw available so far, but I don&#8217;t find their search algorythms to be nearly as good. You still have to wade through much more dreck to find what you are looking for compared to my experience with Altlaw thus far. But I&#8217;m keeping an open mind. There is plenty of room for more than one search site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRJ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278875</link>
		<dc:creator>DRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278875</guid>
		<description>My first experience with computerized legal research was with WestLaw and now we use Lexis.  I welcome this but I bet WestLaw and Lexis aren't that happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first experience with computerized legal research was with WestLaw and now we use Lexis.  I welcome this but I bet WestLaw and Lexis aren&#8217;t that happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278861</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/23/free-legal-research/#comment-278861</guid>
		<description>Lexisone is substantially better.  With Lexisone you have more caselaw available (all appellate courts in every state in addition to the Circuits), a better selection of dates, a Lexis cite you can actually cite to in court, and of course, their coverage is dramatically more up to date than Altlaw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lexisone is substantially better.  With Lexisone you have more caselaw available (all appellate courts in every state in addition to the Circuits), a better selection of dates, a Lexis cite you can actually cite to in court, and of course, their coverage is dramatically more up to date than Altlaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
